約 7,813,594 件
https://w.atwiki.jp/shiin311/pages/11.html
InterWiki用の練習ページです。 他のWikiのページに飛んでみよう。 WikiWikiWeb FrontPage? Tiki WelcomeVisitors? YukiWiki FrontPage? RWiki top? PukiWikiのページで飛んでみよう。 pukiwiki FrontPage? pukiwiki-official FrontPage? pukiwiki-dev FrontPage? 検索だって出来る。 Googleでpukiwikiを検索 Google pukiwiki? YahooでPHPを検索 Yahoo PHP?
https://w.atwiki.jp/kumicit/pages/1030.html
批判サイド インテリジェントデザイン批判 David Wolpertによる、DembskiのNFL定理誤用批判 インテリジェントデザイン理論家Dr. William Dembskiは、遺伝的アルゴリズムについてのNFL定理を使って、進化シミュレーションがこっそり情報を持ち込んでいて、進化できるかのような結論を出しているのだと数学的に証明しようとした。これに対して、2006年に、NFL定理を創った、David Wolpertがその誤用を批判した。 David Wolpert "WILLIAM DEMBSKI S TREATMENT OF THE NO FREE LUNCH THEOREMS IS WRITTEN IN JELLO", Mathematical Review Topics addressed in the field of philosophy fall into two categories. In the first category are topics that have not (yet) been subjected to a broad yet rigorous mathematical formalization. Accordingly, they are "just word arguments", and have not benefitted from the clarity and power that mathematical precision affords. Examples of topics in this first category are philosophies of art, music, and literature, as well as much of ethics, and other parts of the humanities. 哲学で論じらるトピックスは2つのカテゴリに分かれる。第1のカテゴリのトピックスは、まだ幅広く厳密に数学的定式化の対象となっていない。したがって、これらは「ただの言葉の議論」であり、数学的精度をきわめることによる明確化と力からメリットを得られない。そのような第1のカテゴリの例は、芸術・音楽・文学などの哲学や、倫理や人文科学の他の部分である。 By contrast, topics in the second category have been formalized, in a form generally perceived as capturing much of their essence. Such topics include much of what several centuries ago was called "natural philosophy" and is now collectively known as "science". This category also includes those issues in epistemology that were addressed by Gödel s incompleteness theorem and related uncomputability results. これとは対照的に、第2のカテゴリーのトピックスは、それらの本質を把握するものとして、一般的に認識できる形で定式化されている。そのようなトピックスには、数世紀前に「自然哲学」と呼ばれ、今は総称して「科学」と呼ばれるものの大半が含まれる。このカテゴリーには、ゲーデルの不完全性定理によって指摘される認識論や関連する計算不可能結果も含まれる。 In the past several years the issue of whether "inductive inference can justify inductive inference", puzzled over since at least the time of Hume, has migrated from the first category to the second. First in the context of supervised learning [1] (what in statistics is called "regression" or "classification"), and later in the context of search algorithms [2], a body of results has been developed that quantify exactly how and when such induction-justifies-induction can(not) hold. Moreover, this formalization has generated results extending far beyond the original philosophical topic that formed its seed (just as happens with any other formalization of a philosophical topic). These results can be viewed as an extension of traditional Bayesian analysis, into a fully model-independent "geometry of induction". Once factors like the precise inductive algorithm to be used, and the prior probabilities and associated likelihood functions of the problem at hand are specified, the theorems of this geometry tell us what the associated performance of that algorithm is, and how it relates to performance levels that accompany different settings of those factors. ここ数年で、少なくともHumeの時代から問題とされてきた「帰納的推論は帰納的推論を正当化するか」という問題が、第1のカテゴリから第2のカテゴリに移動してきた。最初は、"教師あり学習"[1]の文脈（統計学で回帰あるいは分類と呼ばれる）で、そして次に、探索アルゴリズム[2]という、「どのようなときに、どのようにして演繹が演繹を正当化できるか（できないか）を正確に定量化する」ことから得られた結果の総体である。さらに、この定式は、その種子を形成した元の哲学のトピックを大きく広げた結果を作りだしている（その他のすべての哲学のトピックの定式化でも起きるように）。これらの結果は、従来のベイジアン分析、完全にモデル非依存の「帰納のジオメトリ」への拡張と見ることができる。正確な帰納的アルゴリズムのようなファクターを使い、問題についての事前確率と尤度関数を指定すれば、このジオメトリの定理は我々に、アルゴリズムに伴うパフォーマンスがどんなものか、そして異なるファクターセットに伴うパフォーマンスレベルとどう関連するかを教えてくれる。 In this book, Dembski attempts to turn this category-change trick for the quasi-philosophical topic of whether "intelligent design" is a legitimate alternative to neo-Darwinism. Central to his approach is an attempt to leverage the recent formalization of the induction-justifies-induction topic. In particular, he relies on some of the "No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorems" of the geometry of induction. These theorems, loosely speaking, say that the performance-weighted measure of domains in which some search algorithm A beats some contender algorithm B exactly equals the measure of domains for which the reverse is true. So, for example, in attempting to find a high point on a surface, a hill-ascending algorithm will perform no better than random search, and in fact no better than a hill-descending algorithm, over the space of all surfaces one might search. In short, according to these theorems there is no free lunch; without tailoring one s algorithm to the domain at hand, one has no assurances that that algorithm will perform well on that domain. この本で、Dembskiは、インテリジェントデザインがネオダーウィイズムに対する正統な代案であるか否かという、準哲学トピックについて、カテゴリ変更トリックを行おうとしている。彼のアプローチの中心に、帰納が機能を正当化するという最近の定式化の利用がある。特に、彼は帰納のジオメトリである、NFL定理の一部に頼っている。これらの定理は、おおまかに言って、「探索アルゴリズムAが、対抗するアルゴリズムBに勝利するドメインのパフォーマンスウェイト尺度は、BがAに勝利するドメインの尺度と一致する。」したがって、たとえば、サーフェイス上のハイポイントを探索する昇順アルゴリズムのパフォーマンスは、ランダム探索を超えない。そして、あらゆるサーフェイス上のポイントを探索するとき、降順アルゴリズムのパフォーマンスを超えない。要するに、これらの定理によれば、フリーランチは存在しない。アルゴリズムをそのドメインに特化させない限り、そのアルゴリズムは、そのドメイン上でうまく実行される保証はない。 I say Dembski "attempts to" turn this trick because despite his invoking the NFL theorems, his arguments are fatally informal and imprecise. Like monographs on any philosophical topic in the first category, Dembski s is written in jello. There simply is not enough that is firm in his text, not sufficient precision of formulation, to allow one to declare unambiguously right or wrong when reading through the argument. All one can do is squint, furrow one s brows, and then shrug. DembskiはNFL定理を呼び出しているが、その論は致命的に非公式的かつ不正確であるために、Dembskiはトリックを使おうと試みていると言う他ない。第1のカテゴリの哲学のトピックについてモノグラフのように、Dembskiの本はフニャフニャに書かれている。彼の記述は確固たるものではなく、定式化は厳密ではなく、論を読んでも、正しいか間違っているか、明確にはんていできない。できることは、目を凝らして見て、眉間にしわ寄せ、そして肩をすくめるだけだ。 Nonetheless, there are several points intimately related to Dembski s work that bear emphasizing. First, biologists in particular and scientists in general are horribly confused defenders of their field. When responding to attacks from non-scientists, rather than attempt the rigor that the geometry of induction and similar bodies of statistics provide, they fall back on Popperian incantations, trying to browbeat their opponents into acceding to the homily that if one follows certain magic rituals---the vaunted "scientific method"---then one is rewarded with The Truth. No mathematically precise derivation of these rituals from first principles is provided. The "scientific method" is treated as a first-category topic, opening it up to all kinds of attack. In particular, in defending neo-Darwinism, no admission is allowed that different scientific disciplines simply cannot reach the same level of certainty in their conclusions due to intrinsic differences in the accessibility of the domains they study. それにもかかわらず、Dembskiの著作に関して強調するに値する点がある。第1は、特に生物学者そして科学者一般が、自分の専門分野の擁護者として、あまりに混乱していることである。科学者ではない者から攻撃に対抗するとき、帰納にジオメトリの厳密さや類似する統計の提示ではなく、ポパー呪文に舞い戻り、敵対者を脅して、自慢の科学的方法という魔法の儀式に従うことで真実に到達するのだという教えに、従わせようとする。これらの儀式は、第一原理から数字的に導出されたものではない。"科学的方法"は、あらゆる攻撃について第1のカテゴリのトピックとして扱われる。具体的には、ネオダーウィニズムの擁護として、研究するドメインのアクセシビリティにおける本質的な違いに起因する結論は、確実性の同じレベルに達することができないにで、異なる科学分野の参入を認めない。 This intrinsic lower certainty of neo-Darwinism than (for example) that of quantum electrodynamics means that there is legitimate room for disputation concerning the history of biology on Earth. So if Dembski had managed to use the geometry of induction properly to quantify that some search algorithm occurring in the biological world had, somehow, worked better than all but the fraction 10^{-50} (say) of alternative algorithms, then there would be a major mystery concerning the modern biological mantra. This would be true regardless of whether neo-Darwinists had performed the proper rituals in settling on that mantra. たとえば量子電磁気学に対する、ネオダーウィニズムのこの本質的な下位確実性が、地球上の生命の歴史に関する論争の正統な余地を残す。もし、Dembskiが「生物界に起きる何らかの探索アルゴリズムが、たとえば10^{-50} の代替アルゴリズムより効率が良いか」を定量化するために、適切に帰納のジオメトリを使おうとしていれば、現代生物学マントラに関する大きなミステリーが存在することになっていただろう。これは、「マントラが設定した儀式に、ネオダーウィニズムが従っているか」とは関わりなく、正しい。 However, Dembski does not do this. The values of the factors arising in the NFL theorems are never properly specified in his analysis. More generally, no consideration is given to whether some of the free lunches in the geometry of induction might be more relevant than the NFL theorems (e.g., those free lunches concerning "head-to-head minimax" distinctions that concern pairs of algorithms considered together rather than single algorithms considered in isolation). しかし、Dembskiこれを行うことはない。彼の分析では、NFL定理において生じるファクターの値が適切に指定されることはない。より一般的には、帰納のジオメトリに、NFL定理よりも関連する何らかのフリーランチがあるか、まったく考慮されていない。（例えば、"head-to-head minimax"に関連するフリーランチの識別に、単一アルゴリズムではなく、関連するアルゴリズムペアを同時に考慮していない） 。 Indeed, throughout there is a marked elision of the formal details of the biological processes under consideration. Perhaps the most glaring example of this is that neo-Darwinian evolution of ecosystems does not involve a set of genomes all searching the same, fixed fitness function, the situation considered by the NFL theorems. Rather it is a co-evolutionary process. Roughly speaking, as each genome changes from one generation to the next, it modifies the surfaces that the other genomes are searching. And recent results indicate that NFL results do not hold in co-evolution. 確かに、彼の分析では、考慮対象の生物学プロセスの詳細定式化が大きく省略されている。おそらく、この中で最も明白な例は、生態系のネオ·ダーウィン進化論は、NFL定理で検討する「同一の固定されたフィットネス関数を持って、同一の状況を探索する」ゲノムのセットを必要としない。おおまかに言うと、世代間のゲノムの変化が、他のゲノムの探索サーフェイスを変化させる。そして、最近の結果は、NFLの結果を共進化に適用できないことを示している。 It may well be that there is a major mystery underlying the performance of some search processes that one might impute to the historical transformations of ecosystems. But Dembski has not established this, not by a long shot. 生態系の歴史的変換に転嫁する可能性のあるいくつかの探索プロセスのパフォーマンスの根底に大きな謎があるかもしれない。しかし、Dembskiはロングショットで、これを確立していない。 [1] D. H. Wolpert, Neural Comput. 8 (1996), no. 7, 1341--1390; Neural Comput. 8 (1996), no. 7, 1391--1420 [2] D. H. Wolpert and W. G. Macready, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1 (1997), no. 1, 67--82 Dembskiは結果的には、現時点で、進化を禁じる数学的証明は存在しないことを、明らかにしたようなもの。
https://w.atwiki.jp/madoqa/pages/101.html
Whiskey Kendal Snuff Brand Gawith Hoggarth Name Whiskey Style Grind Moisture Kick nicotine Recommend Notes(JPN) Notes(EN) another review Shop @marscigars.com Menthol base fine ground with a hint of whiskey. Customer @marscigars.com This is a good snuff with neither the whiskey nor the menthol becoming overpowering.With the flip-top can and cheap price it s a good at work/day trip snuff.Like all G H products it s dry and fine, so be careful.
https://w.atwiki.jp/titanquest/pages/503.html
Alexander s Spear 日本語訳：アレクサンダー スピア 性能 201 ~ 213 Damage 25% Piercing Speed Very Slow +22% Pierce Damage 177～414 出血ダメージ/ 3秒間(AE) 129 Bleeding Damage over 3.0 Seconds +28 Dexterity +103 攻撃アビリティ(AE) +51 Offensive Ability +2 to Volley 「アレクサンダー パナプリー」セットの一つ Required Player Level 41 Required Strength 159 Required Dexterity 382 解説 Part of the Alexander's Panoply item set.
https://w.atwiki.jp/vocaloidenglishlyric/pages/990.html
【Tags Aiba Kaoru Miku Tatsh tC S】 Original Music title シンデレラ・ロマンス English music title Cinderella Romance Romaji music title Shinderera Romansu Lyrics written by 愛羽薫 (Aiba Kaoru) Music written by Tatsh Music arranged by Tatsh Singer(s) 初音ミク (Hatsune Miku) Click here for the original Japanese Lyrics Romaji lyrics (transliterated by motokokusanagi2009)： hakuba ni notta ōji sama ga arawareru hi wa konai no garasu no kutsu wa nugi suteta wa kinō ka ototoi ni kabocha no basha wa punk shita?! ōji sama yori kimi ga suki dare yori soba ni itai no super powerful cinderella love love love love lovely darling! koi shite iru yureru koi gokoro♪ super miracle love attack suki suki suki suki dai suki yo karada furueru hodo ni aishiteru♥ dai suki na anata e todoke! special love song♪ yureru koi gokoro kimi eto tsutae tai kara hoshi ni negai kaketa "itsumo kimi no soba ni ire masu yōni..." []
https://w.atwiki.jp/mtgwiki/pages/1557.html
《Willow Satyr》 #whisper 生きている『支配魔法/Control Magic』バリエーションの１つ。 伝説のクリーチャー限定で、コントロールを奪う。 『奪う』効果は主に青・赤に割り当てられた能力であるが、これは緑のクリーチャー。 確かにサテュロスという種族のフレーバー的にはそれっぽくはあるが、特殊といえる。 ちなみにサテュロス(Satyr)とは、ギリシャ神話に出てくる半人半獣の森の神のことである。 本家の青には女帝ガリーナ/Empress Galinaという強敵がいる。性能差は歴然だが、対峙すればこちらが勝つという面白い側面もある。 参考 カード個別評価：オールドエキスパンション
https://w.atwiki.jp/orange_sherbet/pages/23.html
Language Definition - courtney The natural barriers to communication and making friends caused by language. katrina Language includes both verbal and non-verbal communication. non-verbal communication stuff moves to the other pages. we should only talk about verbal communication here. - Jin, Daisuke, Courtney, Yoshimi To Katrina- I think non-verbal communication is the topic for everyday conversations/Manners. So, I will copy your comments there, is that OK!? Analysis - Analysis 1 - Tolerance to non-native speakers Jin People in multicultural areas such as the West coast, New York, Toronto, etc has tolerance in using easy English to the poor English speakers. Since they have lots of non-English speakers in their area, the local people are used to understanding their poor English, and speaking easy English to them. However, the Japanese people don t have the tolerance in speaking with non-Japanese speakers, and therefore, a barrier is created between Japanese and non-Japanese. - Analysis 1 Response - Miki I think the reason if Japanese do not have the way to be tolerace in using easy Japanese to the poor Japanese speakers is some Japanese have never experienced to talk with the poor Japanese speakers. So Japanese do not know how to speak Japanese to the poor Japanes speakers. I do not know how to improve my Japanese to them. Miki - Analysis 1 Response - Daisuke even in california, i heard from courtney, there are 2 kinds of people who can speak easier english and who cannot choose their english for poor speaker. because some people have never learned other language and never been in situation unable to understand language. -Analysis 1 Response - Yoshimi yea,,, there are some people who have tolerance in speaking with non native Japanese speakers in Japan and of course, there are some people who does not like communicating with non native English speakers in the U.S.. I think this is a matter of propotion. So, I basically support Jin s analysis. and, I want to add that young people (especially teens) tend not to have a tolerance in speaking with native speakers from my experience spending years both in Canadian highschool and Japanese schools. - Analysis 3 - Keigo Daisuke this might be other topic, but... "keigo" can be a barrier to communicate with people. in japanese, there is a custom to use "keigo" for elder or upper position people, otherwise it will be rude. especially first time to meet someone, try not to be rude, people should use "keigo." but this "keigo" is useful to show your respect or politeness, however, "keigo" keeps distance of their relationship from person to person. and once you use "keigo," it is hard to switch to "tame-guchi." "tameguchi" is a plain or casual form, but also for younger or lower postion people, and sometimes it can sound looking down people. so it needs to be careful to use "tame-guchi" at the first time. - courtney ICU is a particularly stressful environment when it comes to communicating. There are so many people that are fluent in English and Japanese that those of us that aren t have anxiety about trying to speak a language that we are not fluent in. Also, the environment of ICU allows for NOT speaking Japanese/English...there is always a way to get something done in either language. Which makes practicing a foreign language even more difficult, because people can automatically talk to you in the language you understand, making it simply inconvenient to practice the foreign language. Analysis 4 - Non-verbal language [katrina] One thing that OYRs (and other students who come from different cultures) must look out for in the course of their interaction with the Japanese is ambiguity. Understand that it is part of their culture to say things indirectly and that you are expected to at least be able to read the atmosphere watch the Japanese call, KY. Examples / Actual Cases - Analysis 2 - Daisuke from my experience, oyr students seem they don t want to use japanese when they are playing (especially lower than J3). and some students said they don t want to be bothered with japanese outside of the class (mostly active party people) or tutoring is enough for the practice. - Analysis 2 Response - Katrina I don t really agree that OYRs do not want to use japanese outside the class. I think most of them do, but the problem (specially for native speakers of english) is that most ICU students tend to speak to them in English. So rather than complicate things and make the conversation longer, they would not try to use that time for practicing their Nihonggo. -- Katrina (2008-02-07 00 28 00) - Analysis 2 Response - Daisuke Actually, what I wanted to say was (not all but) OYRs cannot be relax when they are using Japanese, or cannot really enjoy when they have to use Japanese all the time. I know they want to use English as much as they can, and sometimes they try to use Japanese, but still its different from conversation only in Japanese. I think, to relax and enjoy conversation needs high level language skill -- Daisuke (2008-02-07 03 21 46) Analysis 4 - Non-verbal communication - Katrina At the welcome party for new comers held in our dormitory, we (the OYRs) were given the privilege of getting food first. After getting our share, we immediately started eating while everyone else stood quietly in line to get their food. Some time passed by when suddenly, one of our dorm mates (who was American) told us to stop eating. Me and my fellow OYRs were shocked and immediately stopped eating. Turns out we were supposed to wait for everyone to get their food and then eat together. When we asked why no one told us, she said they were too shy to speak up. I scanned the room and all I could see were expressionless faces who are trying to avoid looking at our direction. It really felt awkward. Solution / Recommendation / Suggestion etc. (response to Japanese people having low tolerance for non-native speakers, by Daisuke) solution is easy. just realize that they don t speak japanese fluently, slow down speach speed, pronounce clearly, and when they dont understand, repeat and paraphrase until they understand. - courtney It is also important to realize that the language you speak upon initially meeting someone often determines the kind of language that relationship will take on, weather that be English, Japanese, or a combination of both. katrina Listen when your Japanese friends are talking amongst themselves. Try picking up important words or commonly-used expressions, know the context or situation they are spoken, and try to use them as much and as casually as you can in conversations. I think it s a good way to loosen up a conversation and let your Japanese friends know you re actually interested in speaking the language with them. With regards to non-verbal communication, the best thing to do is to be sensitive. Edit this page
https://w.atwiki.jp/otassya2/pages/47.html
InterWiki用のサーバリストです。 [URL サーバ名] タイプ の形式で記述してください。 NOL [http //wiki.ohmynobu.net/nol/index.php? nol] std 信長の野望オンライン寄合所本陣 [http //wiki.ohmynobu.net/noltest/index.php? noltest] std 信長の野望オンライン寄合所テストサーバー [http //wiki.ohmynobu.net/nolnikki/index.php? nolnikki] std 信長の野望オンライン寄合所日記ノ陣 [http //carca.net/nol/index.php? 天翔日記帳] std NOL日記帳 [http //carca.net/nol/index.php? NOL日記帳] std NOL日記帳 [http //saito-site.main.jp/wiki/index.php? fswiki] std 風雲斉藤交流サイト WikiEngines [http //www.c2.com/cgi/wiki? WikiWikiWeb] raw WikiNameのみなのでraw。 [http //www.todo.org/cgi-bin/jp/tiki.cgi?c=v p= Tiki] euc [http //www.hyuki.com/yukiwiki/yukiwiki.cgi? YukiWiki] yw [http //www.jin.gr.jp/~nahi/RWiki/?cmd=view;name= RWiki] euc [http //digit.que.ne.jp/work/index.cgi? WalWiki] euc [http //fswiki.poi.jp/wiki.cgi? FSWiki] euc [http //www.namaraii.com/hiki/? Hiki] euc [http //xiki.mitsuki.no-ip.com/? Xiki] utf8 [http //tdiary-users.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi? tDiaryUsers] euc PukiWiki [http //pukiwiki.org/? pukiwiki] utf8 [http //pukiwiki.org/? pukiwiki.org] utf8 [http //pukiwiki.sourceforge.jp/dev/? pukiwiki.dev] utf8 Search Engine [http //www.google.co.jp/search?ie=utf8 oe=utf8qプラグインエラー 表示する内容がありません。=$1 lr=lang_ja hl=ja Google.jp] utf8 [http //search.yahoo.co.jp/bin/search?p= Yahoo.jp] euc [http //www.wikipedia.org/wiki/? WikiPedia] euc 辞典 [http //yougo.ascii24.com/gh/search/?pattern= ASCII] sjis ASCII24 デジタル用語辞典 [http //e-words.jp/e.x?w= e-Words] sjis 情報・通信事典 e-Words [http //www.furutani.co.jp/cgi-bin/term.cgi?title= 知的財産用語辞典] sjis 古谷国際特許事務所による知的財産用語辞典 [http //dictionary.goo.ne.jp/cgi-bin/dict_search.cgi?sw=2 MT= 国語辞典] euc goo国語辞典 [http //dictionary.goo.ne.jp/cgi-bin/dict_search.cgi?sw=0 MT= 英和辞典] euc goo英和辞典 [http //dictionary.goo.ne.jp/cgi-bin/dict_search.cgi?sw=1 MT= 和英辞典] euc goo和英辞典 [http //dictionary.goo.ne.jp/cgi-bin/dict_search.cgi?sw=3 MT= 新語辞典] euc goo新語辞典 [http //channel.goo.ne.jp/news/search/search.php3?_v=2 MT= ニュース] sjis gooニュース [http //encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?search= 英英辞典] raw [http //www.foks.info/dicti.php?reading=$1 検索 =intelligent dictionary=all FOKS] euc 東工大提供 FOKS (読み方が分からない漢字を調べる辞書検索システム) [http //ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Wikipedia] utf8 拡張InterWikiName [./?cmd=add page= 新規] [./?cmd=add page= New] [./?cmd=read page= 参照] [./?cmd=read page= View] [./?cmd=edit page= 編集] [./?cmd=edit page= Edit] [./?cmd=search word=$1 type=OR 検索] [./?cmd=search word=$1 type=OR Search]
https://w.atwiki.jp/nds-emu/pages/20.html
InterWiki用の練習ページです。 他のWikiのページに飛んでみよう。 WikiWikiWeb FrontPage Tiki WelcomeVisitors YukiWiki FrontPage RWiki top PukiWikiのページで飛んでみよう。 pukiwiki FrontPage pukiwiki.org FrontPage pukiwiki.dev FrontPage 検索だって出来る。 Googleでpukiwikiを検索 Google pukiwiki YahooでPHPを検索 Yahoo PHP
https://w.atwiki.jp/yurina0106/pages/250.html
タグ おっとり 曲名W 歌 中原涼 作詞 中原涼 作曲 細井聡司 作品 終末少女幻想アリスマチック Beatrice 『終末少女幻想アリスマチック』オリジナルサウンドトラック